Barbara Rosenwein – the author of Emotional Communities and other books and articles that offer new frameworks for thinking about the cultural history of the emotions – is the latest researcher to answer the questions of a curious Scot who wants to know all about the emotions over at Scot in Exile. Go read!
Interview with Barbara Rosenwein
May 8th, 2009 by Kristine
Shakespeare in underwear
May 2nd, 2009 by Kristine
A Dutch lingerie chain store called Hunkemöller has decided to promote their new women’s underwear with a Shakespeare sonnet:
They picked the first two lines of sonnet 20, presumably because they thought the poem went well with the “woman’s face” they display on the poster behind the window. The fact that this face has clearly been painted with lipstick and eyeshadow – and not with “Nature’s own hand” – did not give them pause, nor did they stop at the words “master-mistress of my passion.” Judging from the sweet pale pinks of the lingerie on display, I doubt that they meant to evoke a kind of dominatrix-fantasy.
They probably did not read the rest of the sonnet, or they would have noticed that the nice pair of knickers worn by the mannequin in the window do not contain the “one thing to [the speaker's] purpose nothing” designed for “women’s pleasure”…
Shakespeare’s 445th!
Apr 26th, 2009 by Kristine
No one knows for certain on which day Shakespeare was born, but we do know that four hundred and forty-five years ago today, on 26 April 1564, Shakespeare was baptised in the Holy Trinity church in Stratford-upon-Avon.
We know this because the entry for that day in the baptismal registry survives. It reads:
Guliemus filius Johannes Shakspere” – William son of John Shakespeare. Because babies were customarily baptised three days after birth, Shakespeare’s birthday is celebrated on the 23rd of April. That this day is also St. George’s day (patron saint of England) is a nice coincidence, as is the fact that Shakespeare, and many other poets with him, died on the same day.
I spent the evening of Shakespeare’s birthday in the media park in Hilversum for my second radio experience. I was invited by the same show as last time – BNN Today, and the presenters made my day when they told me they had all been to see Romeo and Juliet together after my first interview. This time, they wanted to know all about Shakespeare’s life – in 10 minutes. The result is below, in Quicktime format.
How many books make you a suspect?
Apr 22nd, 2009 by Kristine
French police researching the case of Julien Coupat – one of the “nine of Tarnac” suspected of sabotaging the overhead lines of the TGV in November 2008 – have sofar been unable to link him to the sabotage. French newspapers now report that police have swooped down on Coupat’s library as their only piece of evidence. The police noted, in bold, that they found five thousand books in the house Coupat lives in. Among them were works on philosophy, history, and literature. They also noted that several of the books were not translations, but editions in the original language. Libération writes:
Dans le dossier d’instruction un long PV revient sur la bibliothèque de la communauté de Tarnac. «Cinq mille ouvrages», écrit en gras le brigadier qui relate les perquisitions du 11 novembre. Des livres conservés dans une pièce de l’appartement du 2, place de l’Eglise, à Tarnac et classés entre «les archives, les pensées philosophiques, les ouvrages littéraires et l’histoire des civilisations».
I haven’t counted our books recently, but I would estimate that we own around 3000. Should we be worried? Perhaps I should, because we own at least one of the 27 books that French police singled out as suspect: Antonio Negri’s Books for Burning. At least I can honestly tell the police it belongs to my partner.
Perhaps the police have adopted president Sarkozy’s attitude to books. He recently complained to have suffered when he was made to read The Princess of Cleves in his youth. The Guardian reports that sales of the book have soared as it has become a symbol of resistance to Sarkozy’s government, especially among French university staff. Similarly, downloads of the leftist cultural critique that Julien Coupat is suspected of having written (and which is actually quite critical of Negri’s work) are soaring. L’insurrection qui vient has been reprinted and is widely available in bookshops.
Literature, mind, body and emotion
Apr 19th, 2009 by Kristine
In the eighteenth century, young female readers were warned not to meddle with romances, novels, and chocolate, all of which were likely to inflame the passions. (182)
This juxtaposition of two of my favourite actitivities- reading and eating chocolate – emblematises Daniel Lord Smail’s view of literature in his On Deep History and the Brain (2008). Like my third addiction, coffee, a novel is a psychotropic substance that alters the chemistry of the brain, and thereby alters moods and feelings.
This view of literature features in the final chapter of a book that is aimed to stimulate historians to revise their view of the grand narrative of history. Although the Judeo-Christian chronology in which history began with Genesis has been abandoned by scientists, it has been translated into a secular key: history in the textbooks is assumed to begin when biological ‘pre-history’ gave way to culture with the rise of civilization, six thousand years ago in Mesopotamia. Traditional reasons for neglecting the Paleolithic, the period from the introduction of stone tools by hominids to the introduction of agriculture (2.6 million years ago-10.000 BC), is a lack of written sources. Smail convincingly demonstrates that current historiography is no longer based on this assumption. There are other signs than writing that historians can analyse. Smail chose to focus on the brain as a means to connect what he calls ‘deep history’ to our current world. Continue Reading »
Cobbe portrait (3)
Mar 29th, 2009 by Kristine
More portrait news: Rupert Featherstone, the director of the Hamilton Kerr Institute in Cambridge, and a supporter of the claim that the Cobbe portrait is Shakespeare, claims that the restorers who removed a layer of paint in 2002 may have destroyed a representation of the aging Shakespeare painted during his lifetime.
The Janssen portrait in the Folger similarly had a layer of paint removed during a restoration in 1988. In the Janssen portrait, the restoration revealed a full head of hair underneath Shakespeare’s baldness. In the Cobbe portrait, The Telegraph reports, “the sitter was given a bouffant hairstyle. It is possible the Earl may have wanted a more flattering image.” Featherstone thinks that the portrait may have been altered as soon as a few months after it was painted.
See The Guardian, UPI, and The Telegraph.
Cobbe Shakespeare portrait (2)
Mar 29th, 2009 by Kristine
This blog’s speculations on the phrase “Principum Amicitias”, no doubt together with expert comments from classicists below the post, have made it into a footnote in the Wikipedia article on the Cobbe portrait! This is a first for me.
The Wikipedia article reports on the controversy over the identification of the portrait that had already started at the time of my last post on the portrait. This post is a summary of the controversy as I have been following it online, in chronological order, followed by my own inexpert opinion.








