<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wordpress 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/22/50/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/22/50</link>
	<description>A weblog on early modern culture, teaching English literature, and what else comes to mind</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kristine</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/22/50#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/22/50#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Peacay! I've noticed that the site has become slower, too. Perhaps I should have waited a bit before upgrading, until all the teething problems have been sorted out... I'll look into the banner, maybe I could reduce the size of the image. And yes, I have a hold on new commenters -- perhaps Wordpress placed the comment according to the time of the original submission, and so it ended up above yours?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Peacay! I&#8217;ve noticed that the site has become slower, too. Perhaps I should have waited a bit before upgrading, until all the teething problems have been sorted out&#8230; I&#8217;ll look into the banner, maybe I could reduce the size of the image. And yes, I have a hold on new commenters &#8212; perhaps Wordpress placed the comment according to the time of the original submission, and so it ended up above yours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacay</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/22/50#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>peacay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/22/50#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Oh...and I just noticed: when I wrote my last comment in the machine thread below, George's comment wasn't there - again this may be unrelated to the Wordpress update. I otherwise presume you have a hold on new commenters? Anyway....just thought I'd pass it on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230;and I just noticed: when I wrote my last comment in the machine thread below, George&#8217;s comment wasn&#8217;t there - again this may be unrelated to the Wordpress update. I otherwise presume you have a hold on new commenters? Anyway&#8230;.just thought I&#8217;d pass it on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacay</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/22/50#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>peacay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/22/50#comment-119</guid>
		<description>The last couple of times I've come here - in the last day or 2 - the site seems to load a little slower and the Earmarks banner didn't load at all until I went into comments and/or reloaded the page.
That's just an observation (on ADSL) and may not be related.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last couple of times I&#8217;ve come here - in the last day or 2 - the site seems to load a little slower and the Earmarks banner didn&#8217;t load at all until I went into comments and/or reloaded the page.<br />
That&#8217;s just an observation (on ADSL) and may not be related.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
