<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Duelling law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/31/52/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/31/52</link>
	<description>A weblog on early modern culture, teaching English literature, and what else comes to mind</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: {clausmoser&#124;com} &#187; Duell in Amsterdam</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/31/52#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>{clausmoser&#124;com} &#187; Duell in Amsterdam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 08:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/31/52#comment-230</guid>
		<description>[...] (Nebenbei: Erst Anfang dieses Jahres haben Duelle in den Niederlanden ihren rechtlichen Sonderstatus eingebüßt. Die letzten, die es zur Anwendung gebracht haben wollten, waren 1997 die Anwälte einiger Fußball-Hooligans, vergeblich allerdings. Würde mich nicht wundern, wenn man bis dahin schlicht vergessen hatte, dass dieses Gesetz noch irgendwo herumlag.)    abgelegt in Kunst Trackback URL &#124; RSS-Feed für Kommentare del.icio.us-Bookmark &#124; Links auf diesen Text [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Nebenbei: Erst Anfang dieses Jahres haben Duelle in den Niederlanden ihren rechtlichen Sonderstatus eingebüßt. Die letzten, die es zur Anwendung gebracht haben wollten, waren 1997 die Anwälte einiger Fußball-Hooligans, vergeblich allerdings. Würde mich nicht wundern, wenn man bis dahin schlicht vergessen hatte, dass dieses Gesetz noch irgendwo herumlag.)    abgelegt in Kunst Trackback URL | RSS-Feed für Kommentare del.icio.us-Bookmark | Links auf diesen Text [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacay</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/31/52#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>peacay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/31/52#comment-165</guid>
		<description>'inky salvoes'

I am &lt;i&gt;so&lt;/i&gt; going to use that in conversations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;inky salvoes&#8217;</p>
<p>I am <i>so</i> going to use that in conversations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristine</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/31/52#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/31/52#comment-147</guid>
		<description>An update on duelling in early modern Holland -- I found the following tidbit in Kiernan's &lt;i&gt;The Duel in European History&lt;/i&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;Holland [...] emerged from its war of independence from Spain the most middle-class country of Europe. Not until 1618 was talk heard of a duel, an outlandish borrowing from France. It was a moment of political crisis, pamphlet warfare raged, and inky salvoes between two controversialists led to a challenge. Maurice of Nassau, son and successor as stadtholder William the Silent, intervened to stop things from going further. (p. 89)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The most middle-class country in Europe, well well...  But there is a logical connection there, I think, between the lack of a strong aristocracy and the lack of a duelling practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An update on duelling in early modern Holland &#8212; I found the following tidbit in Kiernan&#8217;s <i>The Duel in European History</i>:<br />
<blockquote>Holland [...] emerged from its war of independence from Spain the most middle-class country of Europe. Not until 1618 was talk heard of a duel, an outlandish borrowing from France. It was a moment of political crisis, pamphlet warfare raged, and inky salvoes between two controversialists led to a challenge. Maurice of Nassau, son and successor as stadtholder William the Silent, intervened to stop things from going further. (p. 89)</p></blockquote>
<p>The most middle-class country in Europe, well well&#8230;  But there is a logical connection there, I think, between the lack of a strong aristocracy and the lack of a duelling practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kristine</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/31/52#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>kristine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 07:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/31/52#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Why thanks. I am sorry that I don't have any information about duelling and the law in the early modern period in the Low Countries -- there must have been proclamations like King James', or cases like Francis Bacon's in the Star Chamber. If I find the time, I'll try to find out (perhaps Markku Peltonen says something on the Netherlands as well?). Or perhaps anyone reading this knows more about this?

A quick search in the catalogues did turn up a work by one Boris Rousseeuw entitled &lt;i&gt;Eeuwig Edict over het Duel&lt;/i&gt; - &lt;i&gt;Eternal edict on the duel&lt;/i&gt; from 1667.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why thanks. I am sorry that I don&#8217;t have any information about duelling and the law in the early modern period in the Low Countries &#8212; there must have been proclamations like King James&#8217;, or cases like Francis Bacon&#8217;s in the Star Chamber. If I find the time, I&#8217;ll try to find out (perhaps Markku Peltonen says something on the Netherlands as well?). Or perhaps anyone reading this knows more about this?</p>
<p>A quick search in the catalogues did turn up a work by one Boris Rousseeuw entitled <i>Eeuwig Edict over het Duel</i> - <i>Eternal edict on the duel</i> from 1667.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/31/52#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/01/31/52#comment-137</guid>
		<description>I love this. Priceless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this. Priceless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
