<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Quarto Editions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/02/03/55/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/02/03/55</link>
	<description>A weblog on early modern culture, teaching English literature, and what else comes to mind</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kristine</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/02/03/55/comment-page-1#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/02/03/55#comment-177</guid>
		<description>But surely EEBO wouldn't sell the rights to publish their scanned texts, unless Google were prepared to pay a truly huge sum that compensated EEBO's loss of income? Or is there a catch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But surely EEBO wouldn&#8217;t sell the rights to publish their scanned texts, unless Google were prepared to pay a truly huge sum that compensated EEBO&#8217;s loss of income? Or is there a catch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clanger</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/02/03/55/comment-page-1#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Clanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/02/03/55#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Google, who repeatedly claim to want to make texts available freely online, could simply purchase the rights to EEBO and the other, similar databases that so many scholars are locked out of, and make them freely available, instead of re-scanning the same works again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google, who repeatedly claim to want to make texts available freely online, could simply purchase the rights to EEBO and the other, similar databases that so many scholars are locked out of, and make them freely available, instead of re-scanning the same works again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
