<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Essay typography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/03/13/75/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/03/13/75</link>
	<description>A weblog on early modern culture, teaching English literature, and what else comes to mind</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil Renaud</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/03/13/75#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Renaud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 01:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/03/13/75#comment-273</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for the link! Glad you enjoyed the article.

@ Des:
1. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=evidenced
2. Didn't delve any further than I needed to, really; it shows enough that it might do well for other people to look into this. Setting aside three or four hours on a saturday to look through my old essays is not enough for a discussion on variance, but then, I really only wanted people to think about how they used their fonts, not try and cite me as a definitive authority on the matter.

Just wanted to clear that up :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for the link! Glad you enjoyed the article.</p>
<p>@ Des:<br />
1. <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=evidenced" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=evidenced</a><br />
2. Didn&#8217;t delve any further than I needed to, really; it shows enough that it might do well for other people to look into this. Setting aside three or four hours on a saturday to look through my old essays is not enough for a discussion on variance, but then, I really only wanted people to think about how they used their fonts, not try and cite me as a definitive authority on the matter.</p>
<p>Just wanted to clear that up <img src='http://earmarks.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clanger</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/03/13/75#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Clanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/03/13/75#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Anyone who spends that much time worrying about the fonts on their essay papers should be docked a few percentage points for being too damned pretentious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who spends that much time worrying about the fonts on their essay papers should be docked a few percentage points for being too damned pretentious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristine</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/03/13/75#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/03/13/75#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Des, 

I think Phil is being a tad ironic there, after all it's only a makeshift investigation. I like the &lt;a href="http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/itc/charter/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Charter&lt;/a&gt; font, thanks for the tip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Des, </p>
<p>I think Phil is being a tad ironic there, after all it&#8217;s only a makeshift investigation. I like the <a href="http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/itc/charter/" rel="nofollow">Charter</a> font, thanks for the tip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: des von bladet</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/03/13/75#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>des von bladet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/03/13/75#comment-260</guid>
		<description>"Evidenced [sic] over 52 papers"?   With no discussion of variance?  You're all humanitiesistes, isn't it?

As a part-time distance student myself I used Palatino last year, with good results, and I've switched to the very excellent Charter this year, with only one result so far, but a favourable one.  I chose Charter over Georgia because it looks less clumpy at 12 points, and is designed to print nicely on rubbish printers like my Random Inkjet.  

I spent a lot more time worring about margin sizes, though - it's hard to make double-spaced 12-point on A4 look other than stupid, and the key is to fatten the margins right up (~40mm works for me).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Evidenced [sic] over 52 papers&#8221;?   With no discussion of variance?  You&#8217;re all humanitiesistes, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>As a part-time distance student myself I used Palatino last year, with good results, and I&#8217;ve switched to the very excellent Charter this year, with only one result so far, but a favourable one.  I chose Charter over Georgia because it looks less clumpy at 12 points, and is designed to print nicely on rubbish printers like my Random Inkjet.  </p>
<p>I spent a lot more time worring about margin sizes, though - it&#8217;s hard to make double-spaced 12-point on A4 look other than stupid, and the key is to fatten the margins right up (~40mm works for me).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
