<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The gender of reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91</link>
	<description>A weblog on early modern culture, teaching English literature, and what else comes to mind</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Läsande kvinnor vid fönster &#171; Tchoupitoulas</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-94188</link>
		<dc:creator>Läsande kvinnor vid fönster &#171; Tchoupitoulas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-94188</guid>
		<description>[...] The Gender of Reading del ett, del två, del [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Gender of Reading del ett, del två, del [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Booth</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 15:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-1252</guid>
		<description>Most interesting post. I set off at a tangent from it, away from the gender issue, to pursue the matter of which were the texts to be seen with on the early modern tube train.
I see you have new posts which I must read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most interesting post. I set off at a tangent from it, away from the gender issue, to pursue the matter of which were the texts to be seen with on the early modern tube train.<br />
I see you have new posts which I must read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristine</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-986</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-986</guid>
		<description>Thank you misteraitch! I suspected that woodcut might be DÃ¼rer's, but couldn't find the image online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you misteraitch! I suspected that woodcut might be DÃ¼rer&#8217;s, but couldn&#8217;t find the image online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misteraitch</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>misteraitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 09:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-916</guid>
		<description>The woodcut in the comment above is apparently one of &lt;a href="http://employees.oneonta.edu/farberas/arth/ARTH200/durer_artistdrawingnude.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;DÃ¼rer&#8217;s&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="http://www.artrenewal.org/images/artists/c/Corcos_Vittorio/large/Corcos_Sogni_IG_R_3001471.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt;&#8217;s an example of a painting of a woman with books, but not reading them: &lt;i&gt;Sogni&lt;/i&gt; by Vittorio Corcos. Coincidentally, while looking for an image of this painting on-line, I happened upon  &lt;a href="http://gfx.dagbladet.no/pub/artikkel/4/43/435/435158/marilyn2Xart858.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;another&lt;/a&gt;  image of Marilyn Monroe reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The woodcut in the comment above is apparently one of <a href="http://employees.oneonta.edu/farberas/arth/ARTH200/durer_artistdrawingnude.html" rel="nofollow">DÃ¼rer&#8217;s</a>. <a href="http://www.artrenewal.org/images/artists/c/Corcos_Vittorio/large/Corcos_Sogni_IG_R_3001471.jpg" rel="nofollow">Here</a>&#8217;s an example of a painting of a woman with books, but not reading them: <i>Sogni</i> by Vittorio Corcos. Coincidentally, while looking for an image of this painting on-line, I happened upon  <a href="http://gfx.dagbladet.no/pub/artikkel/4/43/435/435158/marilyn2Xart858.jpg" rel="nofollow">another</a>  image of Marilyn Monroe reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacay</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>peacay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-753</guid>
		<description>I didn't typo on purpose, honest!

I 'know' Brandon Kershner from the Joyce email group (he is a pro; I am strictly amateur and lately lazy). That is of course how I knew about the Monroe shot -- I have a vague memory that there were other shots, but this could be my bad memory again.
[You could even attend an International Joycean conference chaired by Brandy in June in Budapest! Email me if you reallllllly want the details. Heh]

In fact I've seen another Joyce listee mentioned here a while ago....Tim Lovell-Smith. You're a radar for the JJ-set obviously ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t typo on purpose, honest!</p>
<p>I &#8216;know&#8217; Brandon Kershner from the Joyce email group (he is a pro; I am strictly amateur and lately lazy). That is of course how I knew about the Monroe shot &#8212; I have a vague memory that there were other shots, but this could be my bad memory again.<br />
[You could even attend an International Joycean conference chaired by Brandy in June in Budapest! Email me if you reallllllly want the details. Heh]</p>
<p>In fact I&#8217;ve seen another Joyce listee mentioned here a while ago&#8230;.Tim Lovell-Smith. You&#8217;re a radar for the JJ-set obviously <img src='http://earmarks.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristine</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-752</guid>
		<description>OK, now I see why I need a comment preview ;o) 

Thanks for the Monroe! You don't need to do the theorizing on that one, Richard Brown &lt;a href="http://www.hrc.utexas.edu/news/newsletters/2002/fall/8.html" target="new" rel="nofollow"&gt;was there before you&lt;/a&gt;. See also his essay "Marilyn Monroe Reading &lt;i&gt;Ulysses&lt;/i&gt;: Goddess or Post-Cultural Cyborg?" in &lt;i&gt;Joyce and Popular Culture&lt;/i&gt;, ed. R.B. Kershner, 1996.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, now I see why I need a comment preview ;o) </p>
<p>Thanks for the Monroe! You don&#8217;t need to do the theorizing on that one, Richard Brown <a href="http://www.hrc.utexas.edu/news/newsletters/2002/fall/8.html" target="new" rel="nofollow">was there before you</a>. See also his essay &#8220;Marilyn Monroe Reading <i>Ulysses</i>: Goddess or Post-Cultural Cyborg?&#8221; in <i>Joyce and Popular Culture</i>, ed. R.B. Kershner, 1996.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacay</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>peacay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-749</guid>
		<description>(damn)

&lt;a href="http://www.columbia.edu/itc/english/seidel/joyce/edit/images/week15/monroe_reads.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;Link : Marilyn Monroe reading Ulysees&lt;/a&gt; [my words/link got eaten or something].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(damn)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.columbia.edu/itc/english/seidel/joyce/edit/images/week15/monroe_reads.jpg" rel="nofollow">Link : Marilyn Monroe reading Ulysees</a> [my words/link got eaten or something].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacay</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>peacay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-748</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure what this one says about the theorizing but &lt;a&gt;. Just for umm....balance, like.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what this one says about the theorizing but <a>. Just for umm&#8230;.balance, like.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristine</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 08:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-689</guid>
		<description>Good point, Helmer! In the case of the naked women reading I signalled during my Google search, such as &lt;a href="http://www.elisetomlinson.com/blog/archives/woman-reading-book-in-field.jpg" target="new" rel="nofollow"&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt;, an erotic element can hardly be denied (I do not recall seeing any naked men reading, by the way). But perhaps there is even more of an erotics to reading in paintings that posit the viewer as a voyeur. 

Although one might nog at first sight say that there is much erotics involved in Pieter Jansens Elinga's reading woman (top-left in my post), the perspective is interesting. It is as if we are standing in the doorway of the room she is in, and are secretly watching her. She's kicked off her red shoes and is withdrawn into the privacy of her book, unaware of our presence. 

&lt;img src="http://www.earmarks.org/wp-content/themes/default/images/elinga.png" class="centered" border="0"/&gt;

Or consider an image such as this one, where we are reading along with a woman  over her shoulder, while she remains absorbed in her text:

&lt;a href="www.askforresearch.co.uk/ ask_for_quality.html" target="new" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.earmarks.org/wp-content/themes/default/images/overhershoulder.jpg" class="centered" border="0"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

The different perspectives on reading that a Google Search throws up, are interesting. Is the reader recorded from behind, from the side, from the front? I think these are factors in the erotics of reading, as is the question of where a person is reading, and what. The two portraits of men in my post can hardly be called erotic: they are depicted from the front, and there is no element of voyeurism involved. But what about depictions of men reading in a private environment, instead of in their studies? Is there an erotics of reading in this painting by John Singer Sargent, do you think? 

&lt;a href=" www.jssgallery.org/ Paintings/Man_Readng(2).htm" target="new" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.earmarks.org/wp-content/themes/default/images/singersargent.jpg" class="centered" border="0"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Oh, and for those who don't remember Phil Bloom, &lt;a href="http://www.beeldengeluid.nl/img.db?12357" target="new" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; she is.

&lt;b&gt;Update:&lt;/b&gt; via Bitch PhD, a link to an &lt;a href="http://bitchphd.blogspot.com/2006/04/i-cant.html"&gt;online essay on the male gaze and advertizing&lt;/a&gt;, which, among many illustrations from the world of advertizing, contains this interesting image (unattributed -- anyone know where it is from?):

&lt;img src="http://www.earmarks.org/wp-content/themes/default/images/onview.jpg" class="centered" border="0"/&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Helmer! In the case of the naked women reading I signalled during my Google search, such as <a href="http://www.elisetomlinson.com/blog/archives/woman-reading-book-in-field.jpg" target="new" rel="nofollow">this one</a>, an erotic element can hardly be denied (I do not recall seeing any naked men reading, by the way). But perhaps there is even more of an erotics to reading in paintings that posit the viewer as a voyeur. </p>
<p>Although one might nog at first sight say that there is much erotics involved in Pieter Jansens Elinga&#8217;s reading woman (top-left in my post), the perspective is interesting. It is as if we are standing in the doorway of the room she is in, and are secretly watching her. She&#8217;s kicked off her red shoes and is withdrawn into the privacy of her book, unaware of our presence. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.earmarks.org/wp-content/themes/default/images/elinga.png" class="centered" border="0"/></p>
<p>Or consider an image such as this one, where we are reading along with a woman  over her shoulder, while she remains absorbed in her text:</p>
<p><a href="www.askforresearch.co.uk/ ask_for_quality.html?PHPSESSID=dd78fcef3ab00183292b3e146632e97a" target="new" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://www.earmarks.org/wp-content/themes/default/images/overhershoulder.jpg" class="centered" border="0"/></a></p>
<p>The different perspectives on reading that a Google Search throws up, are interesting. Is the reader recorded from behind, from the side, from the front? I think these are factors in the erotics of reading, as is the question of where a person is reading, and what. The two portraits of men in my post can hardly be called erotic: they are depicted from the front, and there is no element of voyeurism involved. But what about depictions of men reading in a private environment, instead of in their studies? Is there an erotics of reading in this painting by John Singer Sargent, do you think? </p>
<p><a href=" <a href=?PHPSESSID=dd78fcef3ab00183292b3e146632e97a"http://www.jssgallery.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jssgallery.org/</a> Paintings/Man_Readng(2).htm&#8221; target=&#8221;new&#8221; rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;><img src="http://www.earmarks.org/wp-content/themes/default/images/singersargent.jpg" class="centered" border="0"/></p>
<p>Oh, and for those who don&#8217;t remember Phil Bloom, <a href="http://www.beeldengeluid.nl/img.db?12357" target="new" rel="nofollow">here</a> she is.</p>
<p><b>Update:</b> via Bitch PhD, a link to an <a href="http://bitchphd.blogspot.com/2006/04/i-cant.html">online essay on the male gaze and advertizing</a>, which, among many illustrations from the world of advertizing, contains this interesting image (unattributed &#8212; anyone know where it is from?):</p>
<p><img src="http://www.earmarks.org/wp-content/themes/default/images/onview.jpg" class="centered" border="0"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helmer</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Helmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/04/19/91#comment-678</guid>
		<description>I wasn't born yet, but  somehow I do remember Phil Bloom, the first naked woman on Dutch television in 1967, reading a gigantic newspaper. What about the erotics of reading?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t born yet, but  somehow I do remember Phil Bloom, the first naked woman on Dutch television in 1967, reading a gigantic newspaper. What about the erotics of reading?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
