Comments on: The gender of reading (2) http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/05/05/101 A weblog on early modern culture, teaching English literature, and what else comes to mind Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:44:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Läsande kvinnor vid fönster « Tchoupitoulas http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/05/05/101#comment-94195 Läsande kvinnor vid fönster « Tchoupitoulas Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:42:03 +0000 http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/05/05/101#comment-94195 [...] The Gender of Reading del ett, del två, del [...] [...] The Gender of Reading del ett, del två, del [...]

]]> By: Holly http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/05/05/101#comment-1556 Holly Wed, 17 May 2006 23:12:06 +0000 http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/05/05/101#comment-1556 This post has been included in the 15th carnival of feminists, found <a href="http://holly.mclo.net/archives/2006/05/carnival_of_fem.html" rel="nofollow">here.</a> This post has been included in the 15th carnival of feminists, found here.

]]> By: peacay http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/05/05/101#comment-1308 peacay Mon, 08 May 2006 01:56:13 +0000 http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/05/05/101#comment-1308 Wow. Thanks Kristine. Great summary and good of you to follow up. <i>..are we, as readers of Ulysses’s final chapter, not also voyeurs?</i> That's an insightful comment. If I was to disagree it would only be because I've read it something north of 7 or 8 times and one <i>becomes</i> much more of a participant, which itself adds a twist of complicit voyeurism -- but this strays too far into the field of conjecture or at least Joyeanism. I may have to throw it onto the table for the Joyceans to examine. <a href="http://www.almaleh.com/ecriture/livres.html" rel="nofollow">Something I stumbled across yesterday</a> - I wish these artistic images containing books had a thumbnail page. Sorry, didn't count the gender spread or subject's attitude. Wow. Thanks Kristine. Great summary and good of you to follow up.

..are we, as readers of Ulysses’s final chapter, not also voyeurs?

That’s an insightful comment. If I was to disagree it would only be because I’ve read it something north of 7 or 8 times and one becomes much more of a participant, which itself adds a twist of complicit voyeurism — but this strays too far into the field of conjecture or at least Joyeanism. I may have to throw it onto the table for the Joyceans to examine.

Something I stumbled across yesterday - I wish these artistic images containing books had a thumbnail page. Sorry, didn’t count the gender spread or subject’s attitude.

]]>