<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Green Shakespeare (2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/06/20/111/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/06/20/111</link>
	<description>A weblog on early modern culture, teaching English literature, and what else comes to mind</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Early Modern Notes &#187; Carnivalesque 18</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/06/20/111#comment-10883</link>
		<dc:creator>Early Modern Notes &#187; Carnivalesque 18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/06/20/111#comment-10883</guid>
		<description>[...] If it&#8217;s early modern, how can there not be Shakespeare? Kristine reviewed a book on Green Shakespeare at Earmarks in Early Modern Culture. And at Senselist, a roundup of 8 people who, according to various more or less loony theories, might be the real Shakespeare. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If it&#8217;s early modern, how can there not be Shakespeare? Kristine reviewed a book on Green Shakespeare at Earmarks in Early Modern Culture. And at Senselist, a roundup of 8 people who, according to various more or less loony theories, might be the real Shakespeare. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/06/20/111#comment-8511</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 20:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/06/20/111#comment-8511</guid>
		<description>Typical Egan ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typical Egan ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristine</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/06/20/111#comment-8421</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 18:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/06/20/111#comment-8421</guid>
		<description>Brett, I'm sorry it took me so long to answer your query. The book does discuss notions of climate in the sense of the effects of weather on humans and animals. I didn't think that it discussed the work of the critics you mention, but I wanted to make sure. I just checked the index and, no -- none of them are in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett, I&#8217;m sorry it took me so long to answer your query. The book does discuss notions of climate in the sense of the effects of weather on humans and animals. I didn&#8217;t think that it discussed the work of the critics you mention, but I wanted to make sure. I just checked the index and, no &#8212; none of them are in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/06/20/111#comment-7668</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/06/20/111#comment-7668</guid>
		<description>Does Egan discuss any of the work being done on Renaissance climate theory and natural philosophy by critics like Mary Floyd-Wilson, Carol Thomas Neely, Jim Egan (not related I think), Joyce Chaplin, and Karen Kupperman?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Egan discuss any of the work being done on Renaissance climate theory and natural philosophy by critics like Mary Floyd-Wilson, Carol Thomas Neely, Jim Egan (not related I think), Joyce Chaplin, and Karen Kupperman?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
