<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogger account</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/09/30/122/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/09/30/122</link>
	<description>A weblog on early modern culture, teaching English literature, and what else comes to mind</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kristine</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/09/30/122#comment-12069</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/09/30/122#comment-12069</guid>
		<description>So there is an option to allow comments from "Others" -- meaning people who are not registered with Blogger. Why do most Blogger-bloggers choose to block that option -- because of spam? You still need to type in that silly word-recognition thing as a spam protection, right? 

Blogger-bloggers, tell us why!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So there is an option to allow comments from &#8220;Others&#8221; &#8212; meaning people who are not registered with Blogger. Why do most Blogger-bloggers choose to block that option &#8212; because of spam? You still need to type in that silly word-recognition thing as a spam protection, right? </p>
<p>Blogger-bloggers, tell us why!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacay</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/09/30/122#comment-12067</link>
		<dc:creator>peacay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 09:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/09/30/122#comment-12067</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://help.blogger.com/bin/answer.py?answer=42399" rel="nofollow"&gt;The official word on it.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://help.blogger.com/bin/answer.py?answer=42399" rel="nofollow">The official word on it.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristine</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/09/30/122#comment-12021</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 05:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/09/30/122#comment-12021</guid>
		<description>Peacay, thanks! At least now I know that it &lt;i&gt;might&lt;/i&gt; be possible to comment without creating another blog. Perhaps someone else will let us in on the secret! When I have time, I'll Google around a bit, and see if the trick is described anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peacay, thanks! At least now I know that it <i>might</i> be possible to comment without creating another blog. Perhaps someone else will let us in on the secret! When I have time, I&#8217;ll Google around a bit, and see if the trick is described anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacay</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/09/30/122#comment-12005</link>
		<dc:creator>peacay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/09/30/122#comment-12005</guid>
		<description>Kristine I have seen both commenters who create non-existant blogs but also those who haven't even done that. Sometimes the name in a comment links directly to their non-blogger site and there is nothing in their blogger profile. It's all a bit strange, even stranger still with blogger-beta now online. So there must be tricks to adding html and slipping through without  a blog. But of course I wouldn't know how..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kristine I have seen both commenters who create non-existant blogs but also those who haven&#8217;t even done that. Sometimes the name in a comment links directly to their non-blogger site and there is nothing in their blogger profile. It&#8217;s all a bit strange, even stranger still with blogger-beta now online. So there must be tricks to adding html and slipping through without  a blog. But of course I wouldn&#8217;t know how..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristine</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/09/30/122#comment-11999</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/09/30/122#comment-11999</guid>
		<description>Ah, is that the only way? I already have a Word-Press Express blog darting around in cyberspace (I honestly don't remember what I called it, or where it is!), also brought into this world for purely technical purposes. I would be loath to spawn another blog -- but if there is no other way...

Thanks, Wil!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, is that the only way? I already have a Word-Press Express blog darting around in cyberspace (I honestly don&#8217;t remember what I called it, or where it is!), also brought into this world for purely technical purposes. I would be loath to spawn another blog &#8212; but if there is no other way&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks, Wil!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil Cone</title>
		<link>http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/09/30/122#comment-11996</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil Cone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 17:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earmarks.org/archives/2006/09/30/122#comment-11996</guid>
		<description>I had the same frustration, so I created an empty Blogger blog just for commenting purposes (the only content on my Blogger blog is a link to my real blog).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same frustration, so I created an empty Blogger blog just for commenting purposes (the only content on my Blogger blog is a link to my real blog).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
